NYC Department of Investigation Report / Department of Homeless Services
According to the NYC Department of Investigation’s 2024
report, systemic issues plague the shelter network, which is largely managed by nonprofit providers under contract with DHS. The investigation revealed several disturbing patterns of corruption and mismanagement:
• Conflicts of Interest: Executives and insiders benefiting from non-transparent business dealings linked to shelter operations.
• Excessive Executive Compensation: Multiple shelter executives are earning over $500,000 annually from public funds, with little oversight.
• Nepotism: The hiring of family members in violation of city contracts, raising concerns over favoritism and accountability.
• Lack of Competitive Bidding: Numerous instances where shelters bypassed city procurement rules, allowing for questionable deals and partnerships.
Conflicts of interest top the list as it relates to veterans experiencing homelessness. In addition to denying access to resources and services that promote a successful entrance into the community, DHS and ICL are allowing predatory organizations such as US Patriot Fund and SOS direct contact with vulnerable veterans.
Veterans Affairs Office of Inspector General / Grant & Per Diem Program
These issues, coupled with a lack of proper oversight from the city, have resulted in veterans being left vulnerable in the very programs designed to protect them. A recent investigation by the VA’s Office of Inspector General revealed that 20% of veterans in GPD programs are not accounted for, while their cases are often incorrectly marked as successful transitions.
The VAOIG review team, “Additional Controls Are Needed to Improve the Reliability of Grant and Per Diem Program Data”
estimated that HOMES outcome data were unreliable for about 888 (21 percent) of the 4,151 veterans recorded as having exited the program for permanent housing. In these cases, HOMES data did not match VA medical records, did not match the grantee’s files, or lacked supporting documentation. Additionally, HOMES data did not accurately capture all negative exits—case outcomes where veterans are discharged from the GPD program under negative circumstances.